七个多月前康奈尔大学学生无名氏报道被强奸在学校的Chi Phi兄弟会，她向大学听证会小组详细讲述了2024年10月的事件，称她“被强奸和折磨”
根据美国广播公司新闻查阅的学校记录，她恳求委员会“让康奈尔成为一个更好、更安全的地方”，将她指控袭击她的人赶出校园。
“我卖淫了，我像一群男人的诱饵一样被举起来，我甚至不知道这一切正在发生，”无名氏在2025年5月29日通过电话会议作证，关于她被指控被强奸了8-10个兄弟会成员。
听证会上的一些男子坚持认为，现在是刑事调查主题的性接触是两厢情愿的，但她的一个朋友说，她最初这样认为是因为她“震惊”
这个案件现在震惊了整个大学，并引发了关于对性侵犯指控的处理在全国的大学校园里。
康奈尔大学的第九条调查是秘密进行的，结果没有与纽约汤普金斯县的检察官分享，他们在几个月前拒绝提出指控。根据ABC新闻查阅的警方记录，康奈尔警方确实提供了他们自己的调查结果，但当地的地方检察官办公室拒绝审查这些结果。
美国广播公司新闻频道（ABC News）回顾了为期12天的听证会的记录，这些记录揭示了学校对该事件的漫长调查，因为无名氏和她指控的男子对那天晚上的描述截然不同。在该事件中被指控的七名男子否认了所有不法行为。
简·多伊告诉专家组，她刚刚“了解了发生在她身上的事情的一半”，但对当晚的情况了解得足够多，足以要求专家组对兄弟会成员采取行动。
“我记得被胁迫使用氯胺酮。我记得几个回答者在我身上跑了一列火车，很多次。我记得一个黑暗的房间，不断有男人的影子进进出出，我记得我觉得这是一个笑话，我没有参与其中，”无名氏说，她告诉警方，她在之前的一次活动中喝醉了，但声称她被迫在家里喝下并服用了氯胺酮。
她指控的那些人对那天晚上的情况有不同的描述，他们辩称，这起事件要么是双方自愿的，要么是他们与那次遭遇保持了距离。
其中一名男子说：“事实是（简）可能对那晚感到后悔，我也是，但这些后悔并不等于性侵犯或性剥削。”
一些男性辩称，他们只是走进房间，并没有参与吸毒或性行为。一个Chi Phi的兄弟说，“那天晚上我在事情发生的房间里，但事情发生的时候我不在。”
在她对委员会的陈述中，多伊承认了她记忆中的空白——“我永远不会知道发生在我身上的一切，我知道我已经说了很多，”她说——并试图解释为什么她在事件发生后与这些人的最初交流看起来很友好。
记录显示，她说，“我思想开放，体贴，善解人意”。“但在事件发生后的两三周内，这些品质保护了这些人。我不愿意相信可怕的事情会发生在我身上。”
根据ABC新闻查阅的学校记录，无名氏的一个朋友告诉专家小组，无名氏最初的反应是，这一事件可能是双方自愿的，因为“她开始时有点震惊”。
“我个人认为，她是如此震惊，她只是试图让一切都好起来，也许在那一点上有点让人高兴，”这位朋友作证说。“但我在那个周一一见到她就知道她很不舒服，她对发生的事情不满意，可能还感到尴尬。”
一些兄弟会成员反驳了简·多伊对当晚的评价，认为她同意参加活动，只是在事件的谣言传遍康奈尔大学校园后才改变了她的说法。
“投诉人的言行表明了对我们参与的每一项行动的肯定同意，”一名兄弟说。“这里极有可能是申诉人发起了这项［调查］．．．由于公众对这一事件的看法以及犯罪警报发布后出现的谣言。”
一些声称他们没有参与性行为的兄弟-只是在房间里短暂出现-认为他们受到了不公平的惩罚。
“很明显，（无名氏）感到不安和委屈，她的一些甚至全部沮丧可能是有根据的。但［无名氏］的声明并不是基于事实和真相，而是表明了让所有成员承担责任的愿望和需要，不管他们的具体行为如何，”一位兄弟说。
根据记录，在为期12天的听证会结束时，简·多伊告诉委员会，这一事件最终改变了她对康奈尔的看法，从她曾经梦想的学校变成了她“被强奸和折磨”的地方。
“我请求这个小组让我所爱的人和整个社区更加安全，并让这些男孩离开校园，”她说。“我不会在那里看到变化，但删除这些受访者将使康奈尔成为一个更好、更安全的地方。”
三个月后，该小组发布了对该事件的决定，开除了两名据称参与该事件的学生，并暂停了另外两名学生的学业。
据她的律师称，无名氏因该事件从康奈尔大学退学，并已就此案提起民事诉讼。诉讼中被点名的人没有一个在法庭上回应，尽管每个人都在公开声明中或通过他们的律师否认对调查人员有不当行为。
纽约司法部长莱蒂夏·詹姆斯是进行调查周二，康奈尔大学的董事会宣布，他们已经联系了律师事务所King＆斯伯丁到进行独立调查由美国前代理司法部长萨利·耶茨领导。
What Jane Doe told Cornell hearing panel about alleged 2024 gang rape
More than seven months after the former Cornell University student known as Jane Doe reportedbeing rapedat the school＇s Chi Phi fraternity house， she gave a university hearing panel a detailed account of the October 2024 incident， saying she was ＂raped and tormented．＂
And she pleaded with the panel to ＂make Cornell a better and safer place＂ by removing from campus the men she alleged attacked her， according to school records reviewed by ABC News．
＂I was prostituted， and I was held up like bait for a gaggle of men， and I didn＇t even know it was happening，＂ Jane Doe testified via teleconference on May 29， 2025， regarding allegations that shehad been rapedby 8-10 fraternity brothers．
Some of the men in the hearing maintained that the sexual encounter， which is now the subject of a criminal investigation， was consensual， but a friend of hers said that she felt that way initially because she was in ＂shock．＂
The case has now rocked the university and started conversations abouttreatment of alleged sexual assaulton college campuses across the country．
The Cornell Title IX investigation took place behind closed doors， and the results were not shared with prosecutors in Tompkins County， New York， who had declined to bring charges months earlier． Cornell Police did offer the results of their own investigation， but the local district attorney＇s office declined to review them， according to police records reviewed by ABC News．
ABC News has reviewed transcripts of the 12-day hearing that shed light on the school＇s lengthy investigation into the incident， as Jane Doe and the men she accused offered drastically different accounts of that evening． The seven men accused in the incident have denied all wrongdoing．
Jane Doe told the panel that she was barely ＂halfway through the process of understanding what happened＂ to her --- but knew enough about the evening to ask the panel to take action against the fraternity members．
＂I remember being coerced into using ketamine． I remember several respondents running a train on me， many different times． And I remember a dark room with shadows of men in and out constantly， and I remember feeling like there was a joke and I was not in on it，＂ said Jane Doe， who told police she was intoxicated that evening from a prior event， but alleges that she was pressured to drink and consume ketamine at the house．
The men she accused offered a different account of the evening， arguing that the incident was either consensual， or distancing themselves from the encounter．
＂The truth is that ［Jane］ may have regrets about that night， as do I， but those regrets do not amount to sexual assault or sexual exploitation，＂ said one of the men．
Some of the men argued they only walked into the room without engaging in the drug use or sexual acts． One Chi Phi brother said， ＂I was in the room where it happened that night， but not when it happened．＂
During her statement to the panel， Doe acknowledged the gaps in her memory -- ＂I will never know everything that happened to me， and I know I＇ve said that a lot，＂ she said -- and sought to explain why some of her initial communications with the men after the incident appeared friendly．
＂I＇m open-minded， and thoughtful， and empathetic，＂ she said， according to the records． ＂But for two or three weeks following the event， those qualities protected the ［men］． I didn＇t want to believe something terrible could happen to me．＂
One of Jane Doe＇s friends told the panel that Jane Doe＇s initial reaction that the incident may have been consensual was because ＂she was in a little bit of shock at the beginning，＂ according to school records reviewed by ABC News．
＂I believe personally that she was such in shock that she was just trying to make everything okay and maybe kind of a people pleaser at that point，＂ the friend testified． ＂But I knew she was uncomfortable as soon as I saw her on that Monday and that she wasn＇t okay with what happened and maybe embarrassed．＂
Some of the fraternity brothers pushed back on Jane Doe＇s assessment of the evening， arguing that she consented to the activity and only changed her account after rumors of the incident spread across Cornell＇s campus．
＂The complainant＇s words and actions demonstrated affirmative consent to each action we engaged in，＂ one brother said． ＂What is highly possible here is that the complainant initiated this ［investigation］ ．．． due to the public perception of the event and rumors that arose after the issuance of the crime alert．＂
Some of the brothers who alleged they did not participate in the sex acts -- but were briefly present in the room -- argued they were being unfairly punished．
＂It is clear ［Jane Doe ］ was upset and felt wronged， and some or even all of her frustration may be valid． But instead of being born from facts and truths， ［Jane Doe＇s］ statements show both a desire and need to hold all members accountable， regardless of their specific actions，＂ said one brother．
At the end of the 12-day hearing， Jane Doe told the panel that the incident ultimately changed her view of Cornell， from what was once her dream school to the place where she was ＂raped and tormented，＂ according to the records．
＂I ask the panel to please make it safer for those that I love and the community at large， and to remove those boys from the campus，＂ she said． ＂I will not be there to see the change， but removing these respondents will make Cornell a better and safer place．＂
The panel issued their decision about the incident three months later， expelling two of the students allegedly involved in the incident and suspending two other students．
Jane Doe withdrew from Cornell due to the incident， according to her attorney， and has filed a civil suit in the case． None of the men named in the suit have responded in court， although each has denied wrongdoing to investigators， in public statements， or through their lawyers．
New York Attorney General Letitia James isconducting an investigationinto the incident， and on Tuesday， Cornell＇s board of trustees announced it had tapped the law firm King＆Spalding toconduct an independent probe， led by former acting U．S． attorney general Sally Yates．
