美国总统唐纳德·特朗普（Donald Trump）周二在联合国大会期间与格陵兰和丹麦总理签署了一项安全协议。
特朗普在谈到丹麦的Mette Frederikson和格陵兰的Jens-Frederik Nielsen时说：“这是一次与伟大的人一起的惊人之旅。”。
特朗普说：“这对欧洲和美国、对每个人以及对格陵兰来说都是巨大的。”“这将是不可思议的，格陵兰岛的人民非常友好。丹麦人民一直很棒，所以我知道这将是一种长期的、奇妙的关系。”
该协议是在特朗普数月来不断升级的言论之后达成的，特朗普一再威胁要以国家安全为由接管这片领土。特朗普的威胁，包括拒绝排除以武力夺取领土的可能性，播下的紧张美国和它的欧洲盟友之间格陵兰人的惊愕．
格陵兰是丹麦的自治领土，它抵制了特朗普通过收购或军事力量“接管”该岛的呼吁。丹麦领导人表示，他们愿意就美国军事存在的新框架进行谈判，但该领土的主权是一条红线。
三边协议的文本揭示了一些繁文缛节，这些繁文缛节限制了特朗普政府官员所宣传的在格陵兰岛做其认为必要的事情的“完全能力”。
虽然这笔交易似乎达不到“完全和全面控制“特朗普曾经呼吁的美国，确实赋予了美国扩大其在格陵兰岛军事足迹的能力。
该协议授权格陵兰和丹麦审查美国提出的“在加速的政府批准程序下”建造无人军事设施的请求
弗雷德里克森称赞该协议，称其比1951年与美国达成的协议“更大、更好”。
“75年前，我们达成了一项关于保卫格陵兰的协议。今天，我们将签署一项更大、更好的协议，一项可以永远持续下去的协议，”她说。
“总统先生，你已经很清楚了。你不希望对手靠得太近。我完全同意，但有了这个协议，他们就不是了，”她补充道。
根据新协议修订的1951年协议，美国已经享有扩大其在该岛的基地和军事足迹的广泛自由。
尼尔森承认，美国的国家安全担忧是合理的，并赞扬了达成协议的谈判过程。
“北极的安全形势正在发生变化，我们认识到总统先生您刚才正确谈到的长期安全威胁。正是因为这个原因，我们才坚持进行建设性的对话。“你们的安全就是我们的安全，我们的安全就是你们的安全。”
尼尔森称该协议是历史性的，对各方都是“三赢”。
北大西洋公约组织（North Atlantic Treaty Organization）秘书长马克·吕特在X上发表声明，“这项协议，连同北约在确保这一重要地区安全方面的作用越来越大，这加强了我们的集体安全，并为我们所有人提供了一个更安全、更稳定的未来。＂
特朗普上周五在社交媒体平台上发表声明说，“在我的指示下，我们与丹麦和格陵兰的代表合作，保证美国永远有能力在格陵兰采取必要的行动，以确保和捍卫格陵兰和美利坚合众国的安全。”
周二公布的协议文本申明，美国可以在现有的皮图菲克航天基地“实现现代化并扩大其活动”，并表示可以在Narsarsuaq和Mestersvig建立更多的基地，遵循签署国已经同意的具体条款。
如果美国希望扩大其足迹，该协议要求它提出一项建议，所有各方将“立即召集”通过一个由早期谅解备忘录建立的常设委员会进行审查。
如果在90天内没有达成协议，该协议规定，该提案将被提升到副部长级别，如果没有达到部长级别-国务卿和同等级别。该案文没有说明如果磋商没有达成共识会发生什么。
该协议授权格陵兰和丹麦审查美国提出的“在加速的政府批准程序下”建造无人军事设施的请求
尽管该协议详细规定了美国军方自由进入陆地、空中和海上航线的权利，但它似乎并没有实质性地推进1951年防务协定授予的特权。
该协议还禁止非北约在格陵兰建立军事设施，除非三方同意破例。
该协议还禁止非北约成员国、非北约伙伴国、非欧盟成员国的国家和个人对包括关键基础设施和资源开采在内的“特别敏感部门”拥有控制权或重大影响力。该协议让格陵兰负责确保这些禁令在其当前或未来的投资审查法律中得到遵守。
该协议规定没有结束日期，并为格陵兰宣布从丹麦独立的意外情况做了计划。独立的格陵兰将同意继续成为北约成员，尽管这一决定可能不完全取决于格陵兰、美国或丹麦——加入联盟需要所有北约成员的批准，独立的格陵兰必须通过申请程序。
Trump signs security agreement with Greenland and Denmark， but isn＇t ＇complete＇ change
President Donald Trump signed a security deal with the prime ministers of Greenland and Denmark on Tuesday on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly．
＂This has been an amazing journey with tremendous people，＂ Trump said of Denmark＇s Mette Frederikson and Greenland＇s Jens-Frederik Nielsen．
＂This is tremendous for Europe and for the United States， for everybody， and for Greenland，＂ Trump said． ＂It＇s going to be incredible， and the people of Greenland have been so nice． The people of Denmark have been amazing， and so I know it＇s going to be a long-term， fantastic relationship．＂
The agreement comes after months of escalating rhetoric from Trump， who has repeatedly threatened to take over the territory citing national security purposes． Trump＇s threats， including refusing to rule out taking the territory by military force，sowed tensionbetween the U．S． and its European allies and sparkedconsternation from Greenlanders．
Greenland， which is an autonomous territory of Denmark， resisted Trump＇s calls to ＂take over＂ the island via acquisition or military force． Danish leaders said they were open to negotiating new frameworks for the U．S． military＇s presence， but that the sovereignty of the territory was a red line．
The text of the trilateral agreement reveals some red tape that constrains what Trump administration officials have billed as the ＂complete ability＂ to do what it deems necessary in Greenland．
While the deal appears to fall short of the ＂Complete and Total Control＂ by the U．S． that Trump once called for， it does grant the U．S． ability to expand its military footprint in Greenland．
The deal gives Greenland and Denmark the authority to review requests from the U．S． to build unmanned military installations ＂under accelerated governmental approval procedures．＂
Frederikson praised the agreement， saying that it was ＂bigger and better＂ than the deal struck with the U．S． in 1951．
＂Seventy-five years ago， we entered into an agreement about the defense of Greenland． Today we are signing an even bigger and better agreement， a deal that can last forever，＂ she said．
＂Mr． President， you have been very clear． You don＇t want adversaries to come too close． I fully agree， and with this deal， they are not，＂ she added．
Under the 1951 agreement amended by the new pact， the U．S． already enjoyed wide latitude to scale up its bases and military footprint on the island．
Nielsen acknowledged that the U．S． national security concerns are legitimate and praised the negotiation process that led to the agreement．
＂The security landscape in the Arctic is changing， and we recognize the long term security threats that you， Mr． President， have rightly spoken about． It is for that very reason that we have insisted on engaging in a constructive dialog，＂ he said． ＂Your security is our security， and our security is your security．＂
Nielsen called the agreement historic and a ＂win-win-win＂ for all parties．
NATOSecretary General Mark Rutte posted on X， ＂This agreement， along withNATO＇s growing role in securing this vital region， enhances our collective security and supports a safer and more stable future for us all．＂
In a post on his social media platform last Friday， Trump declared， ＂At my direction， we worked with representatives of Denmark and Greenland to guarantee that the United States will FOREVER have the complete ability to do what is necessary in Greenland in order to secure and defend the security of Greenland， and the United States of America．＂
The text of the deal affirms released Tuesday states that the U．S． can ＂modernize and expand its activities＂ at its existing Pituffik Space Base and says it can establish additional bases at Narsarsuaq and Mestersvig， following specific terms that the signatories had already agreed to．
If the U．S． wants to expand its footprint beyond that， the agreement requires that it puts forward a proposal that all parties will ＂immediately convene＂ to review via a standing committee that was established by an earlier memorandum of understanding．
If no agreement is reached within 90 days， the deal specifies that the proposal will then be elevated to the deputy minister level， and if that fails to the minister level -- secretary of state and equivalents． The text does not say what would happen if those consultations don＇t end in a consensus．
The deal gives Greenland and Denmark the authority to review requests from the U．S． to build unmanned military installations ＂under accelerated governmental approval procedures．＂
While the agreement details the U．S． military＇s right of free access to land， air and sea routes， it does not appear to materially advance privileges granted by the 1951 defense pact．
The agreement also bars non-NATO from establishing military installations in Greenland unless the three parties agree to make an exception．
The agreement also bans countries and individuals from countries that are either not NATO members or partners nor members of the European Union from having control or significant influence over ＂Particularly Sensitive Sectors＂ that includes critical infrastructure and the extraction of resources． The deal puts Greenland in charge of ensuring these prohibitions are upheld under its current or future investment screening laws．
The agreement specifies it has no end date and it plans for a contingency in which Greenland declares its independence from Denmark． An independent Greenland will agree to remain a member of NATO， athough that decision would likely not be entirely up to Greenland， the U．S． or Denmark -- joining the alliance requires the approval of all NATO members and an independent Greenland would have to go through the application process．
