马萨诸塞州参议员伊丽莎白·沃伦。周五，她参加了“观点”节目，重申了她所说的如果罗伊诉韦德案被推翻，将会对女性健康产生毁灭性的影响。

自从塞缪尔·阿利托法官意见草案的泄露这将废除罗伊诉韦德案于周一公布，沃伦一直直言不讳地反对法院和共和党领导人，他们一直在推动各州禁止合法堕胎的法律。

沃伦告诉《观点报》,如果最高法院推进这一决定，对于那些负担不起前往允许堕胎的地方的妇女来说，这将是最艰难的，包括那些生活在贫困和少数民族中的妇女。

“这要落在谁身上?这将落在这个国家最脆弱的女性身上，”参议员告诉《观点报》。

在泄露的关于最高法院密西西比州15周堕胎禁令案件的草案中，阿利托认为宪法“没有禁止每个州的公民监管或禁止堕胎。”

泄露的草案显示，另外四名最高法院法官支持阿利托。该文件不是最终的，在最终裁决之前，意见可能会改变。

参议院民主党人出台了《妇女健康保护法》这将在联邦一级编纂罗伊诉韦德案;然而，该法案不太可能获得通过所需的60票。

沃伦说，重要的是美国人民看到他们的领导人在宣誓下支持堕胎权。

“这个计划让每个人都记录在案，”她说。“如果我们没有足够的人来完成这项工作，现在就是时候投入战斗了。”

缅因州共和党参议员苏珊·科林斯告诉ABC新闻，她将对该法案投反对票。然而，她和阿拉斯加州民主党参议员莉萨·穆尔科斯基提出了另一项名为“生殖选择法案”(Reproductive Choice Act)的法案，该法案将禁止各州对女性在胎儿能够存活之前选择终止妊娠的能力施加“不当负担”。

该法案将允许各州保留其他限制。

沃伦告诉“观点”，她不支持替代法案，因为有太多的漏洞，允许堕胎获得限制。

Evelyn Hockstein/路透社

伊丽莎白·沃伦在美国最高法院外的抗议活动中做出反应...

“这实际上是为了确保有充分的保护，”她说。

沃伦还警告说，阿利托泄露的草案可能会在未来对基本的美国权利提出法律挑战，如同性婚姻、避孕权和跨种族婚姻。

“当你读到阿利托法官的意见时，他关注的是历史，”她说。“我们没有保护同性婚姻的悠久历史，我们没有跨种族婚姻的悠久历史。”

Elizabeth Warren talks to 'The View' about the repercussions of ending Roe v. Wade

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., joined "The View" Friday to reiterate what she says will be the devastating effects on women's health if Roe v. Wade is overturned.

Since theleak of Justice Samuel Alito's draft opinionthat would repeal Roe v. Wade was released Monday, Warren has been vocal about her opposition to the court and Republican leaders who have been pushing laws in states to ban legal abortion.

Warren told "The View" that if the Supreme Court moves forward with the decision, it will be hardest on women who can't afford to travel to locations that permit abortion, including those living in poverty and minorities.

"Who is this going to fall on? This is going to fall on the most vulnerable women in the country," the senator told the View.

In the leaked draft regarding the Supreme Court’s case on Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban, Alito contended the Constitution “does not prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating or prohibiting abortion.”

The leaked draft indicated that four other Supreme Court justices have sided with Alito. The document is not final and opinions can change before the final ruling.

Senate Democrats haveintroduced the "Women's Health Protection Act"which would codify Roe v. Wade at the federal level; however, it is unlikely that the bill will get the 60 votes needed to pass.

Warren said it is important that the American people see which of their leaders supported abortion rights under oath.

"The plan gets everyone on the record," she said. "If we don’t have enough people to get this done right, this is the time to get into the fight."

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, told ABC News that she would vote no on the bill. However, she and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, D-Alaska, have proposed another bill dubbed "Reproductive Choice Act," which would prohibit states from imposing an "undue burden" on the ability of a woman to choose to terminate a pregnancy before the fetus is viable.

The bill would allow states to keep other restrictions in place.

Warren told "The View" that she doesn't support the alternate bill because there are too many loopholes that allow for abortion access to be restricted.

"What this is really about is about making sure there is full protection," she said.

Warren also warned that Alito's leaked draft could open up future legal challenges to fundamental American rights such as marriage for same-sex couples, the right to contraception and interracial marriage.

"When you read Justice Alito's opinion, he focuses on history," she said. "We don’t have a long history of protecting same-sex marriage, we don’t have a long history of interracial marriage."